A press release from the
Photo Imaging Council
This information may be freely reproduced, with a credit to PIC
![]()
30 June 1999 EUROPEAN DIRECTIVE ON CONSUMER GUARANTEES The Directive on the Sale of Consumer Goods and Associated Guarantees
comes into force on 1 January 2002. The draft Directive has to
be approved by the Parliament and the Council of the European
Union but this is regarded as a mere formality. It seems likely
that the Directive will be implemented in the UK by regulations
which will run alongside the Sales of Goods Act 1979. The members of the Photo Imaging Council desire that the provisions
of the Directive are interpreted in the same way throughout the
UK and the other 14 EU member states. This will benefit everyone:
consumers, retailers and producers in the different EU member
countries. The Photo Imaging Councilís interpretations conform
to those of the DTI. The European Commission has a long term goal to decrease differences
in national laws which distort the single market and it therefore
aims to harmonise consumer protection law for those consumers
who purchase defective goods. In the UK the Directive does this
mainly by bringing other countries up to the UKís already high
standards. It should not change relationships between a quality
retailer and his customer. The Directive will provide a two year period of rights for the
consumer who purchases goods with defects present at the date
of delivery from the producer (ie the manufacturer or importer
or someone purporting to be the producer who places his name or
other sign on the goods). If a fault ëbecomes apparentí consumers
will be entitled to a repair or replacement or price reduction
or a refund within the two year period (Article 5.1). However,
the Directive is NOT a durability measure and does not require
that goods ñ such as certain types of film - should last for 2
years. Member states have the option of requiring consumers to inform
the seller within 2 months from the date the lack of conformity
was detected. If a defect appears within the first 6 months after
purchase a seller must prove the product was sold without a defect.
The lack of conformity is presumed to have existed at the time
of delivery unless this is proved otherwise. Sellers must deliver goods to consumers which are in conformity
with the contract of sale (Article 2). Thus goods should: If the consumer was aware of the lack of conformity when the contract
was entered into, or could not unreasonably have been unaware
of it, then there is no lack of conformity. Therefore, if the
customer is told there is a scratch on the camera body, he cannot
complain about it later. Article 3 entitles the consumer to have the goods brought into
conformity by a free of charge repair or replacement or a reduction
in the price or rescission of the contract. Article 3.3 provides
that in the first place the consumer can require the seller to
repair the goods or replace them free of charge ëunless this is
impossible or disproportionateí. It will be disproportionate if
it imposes costs on the seller which compared with the alternative
remedy are unreasonable. Account is taken of the value of the
goods if there was no lack of conformity, the significance of
the lack of conformity and whether the alternative remedy can
be completed without significant inconvenience to the consumer.
The repair or replacement must take place within a reasonable
time and without significant inconvenience to the consumer. If
it is impossible or disproportionate to require the seller to
replace or repair the goods, the consumer may then require a reduction
in the price or rescind the contract. If the lack of conformity
is minor the consumer is not entitled to rescind the contract.
Thus a retailer will have need to discuss and negotiate a fair
remedy with the consumer, as happens already. Article 4 gives the final seller the right (where the lack of
conformity is caused by an act or omission by the producer) to
pursue remedies against the person liable in the contractual chain
unless the final seller has renounced that entitlement. The Article
provides that national law will determine the person against whom
the final seller may have remedies. A manufacturer's or retailer's guarantee will be legally binding
under conditions laid down in the guarantee statement and associated
advertising. The guarantee must state that the consumer's statutory
rights are not affected by the guarantee. On request by the consumer
the guarantee must be available in writing. Extended warranties
are not covered by this legislation. Any term in an agreement
with the seller which is made before the seller knows the goods
are defective and which waives or restricts rights given by the
Directive is not binding on the consumer. In conclusion, the consumer must pay for service due to customer
misuse or fair wear and tear in the normal way. The Directive
is not a "Guarantee" - the consumer has rights only if there was
a fault at delivery. Customers cannot insist on automatic replacement,
or other remedy, irrespective of the nature of the problem. The
retailer's position has to be taken into account and both parties
have to be reasonable. As long as everyone understands and interprets
the intentions of the Directive's provisions in the same way,
then this is an evolutionary step in consumer protection. ~ ends ~ Please contact the Photo Imaging Council if you would like this
release e-mailed to you. Photo Imaging Council
BP27
PRESS RELEASE
ie no change from current UK law.
Orbital House, 85 Croydon Road
Caterham, Surrey CR3 6PD
Tel: +44 (0) 1883 334497
Fax: +44 (0) 1883 334490
E-mail: pic@admin.co.uk
![]()